Technical specifications - fuel consumption
Alfa Romeo
Aston Martin
Audi
Bentley
BMW
Bugatti
BYD
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Chrysler
Citroën
Cupra
Dacia
Daewoo
Daihatsu
Dodge
DS
Ferrari
Fiat
Ford
Honda
Hummer
Hyundai
Infiniti
Jaguar
Jeep
Kia
Lada
Lamborghini
Lancia
Land Rover
Lexus
Lynk & Co
Maserati
Mazda
McLaren
Mercedes-Benz
MG
MINI
Mitsubishi
Nissan
Opel
Peugeot
Porsche
Renault
Rover
Saab
Seat
Skoda
Smart
Subaru
Suzuki
Tata
Tesla
Toyota
Trabant
Volkswagen
Volvo
Latest auto technical data comparison
- Volkswagen Amarok II vs. Toyota Hilux Extra Cab VIII (facelift 2020) vs. Ford Ranger III Double Cab (facelift 2019)
- Ford Puma vs. Hyundai Kona vs. Ford Puma
- Audi 80 (B2, Typ 81,85) vs. Nissan Navara II (D22)
- Kia Soul I vs. Kia Sportage IV
- Skoda Kamiq vs. Skoda Karoq vs. Skoda Kamiq
- Honda ZR-V vs. Toyota Corolla Cross (facelift 2024)
- Dacia Logan III vs. Kia Stonic
- Audi A3 Sportback (8PA, facelift 2008) vs. Audi A3 Sportback (8V)
- Hyundai Tucson IV vs. Skoda Superb III
- Peugeot 3008 II (Phase II, 2020) vs. Hyundai ix35 (Facelift 2013) vs. Nissan Juke II
- Opel Astra J (facelift 2012) vs. Peugeot 208 I (facelift 2015) vs. Opel Astra J (facelift 2012)
- Volkswagen Golf VIII vs. Volkswagen Taigo vs. Volkswagen Golf VIII
- Audi 100 (C2, Typ 43) vs. Citroën Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso (Phase II, 2010) vs. Audi 100 (C2, Typ 43)
- Dacia Duster II (facelift 2022) vs. Toyota C-HR I (facelift 2020) vs. Dacia Duster II (facelift 2022)
- Kia Xceed (facelift 2022) vs. Hyundai i30 III (facelift 2020) vs. Kia Xceed (facelift 2022)